Text analysis for question 4 – FA cup final
modern vs. old
In terms of lexical choice text J uses many
more jargon terms such as ‘silverware’ because of the ever increasing audience
in football. This is mainly down to the advance in technology, increasing the ease
to which a text can be distributed and the advanced popularity of football
between the two texts. Technology has allowed more people to read and watch
football over the years, the vast majority of people have a TV or the internet
which will allow them to read and watch football. The fact that text J is an
internet article means people had to independently search for it out of their
own choice. This allow the text to be more specific, using more jargon terms,
as there is a larger pragmatical understanding between the writer and the
audience. Text I does also have a smaller use of jargon throughout.It uses jargon phrases such as 'to bring the cup to manchester' and 'the city team.' These phrases are jargon terms but appear understandable to non football supporters. People can suggest that a cup represents a trophy and that the city team is one of the ppposing teams because they are obvious. The development of new jargon terms over the years changes because of the development of technology.
When investigating grammar there is a clear
difference between the use of emotive language and the tone of voice. When
specifically looking at the contrast in the loosing managers quote there is an
obvious difference in tone of voice and emotive language. For example the older
quote offers ‘congratulations’ to the opposition whereas the modern day quote
says ‘I’m sorry we couldn't see it through to the death of them.’ Text I offers
complements for the opposition whereas text J takes responsibility for the loss
explaining it was down to his own team being not good enough. In terms of
power, today we are more concerned that someone else is getting creditied. Not conceding that the other team was better, like text I, maintains
coercive power. It appears slightly aggressive and withholds a reward of the
other team receiving congratulations. Perhaps in the past we were more gentlemen
like an accepted defeat offering power to the other team. The tone of
aggression in the modern text fits in with a semantic structure of war and a
battlefield. Using phrases like ‘to the death of them’ shows how concerned we
are with maintaining power today. This could be related to the vast increase of
money in football. Today winning a major trophy is financially rewarding in
many ways and in text I this may not be the case explaining the gentlemen like
behaviour when conceding defeat.
Looking at the contrast in layout and
graphology there is a clear difference in discourse structure between the two
texts. The older text J uses headings and sections with little white space in-between.
The closed in typography and lack of white space represents the fact that at
the time printing was a privilege and cost a lot of money. Printing had only
recently come about and it was a lengthy expensive process to complete. This
links to the fact that it is a souvenir piece and that is made to be kept and
looked after for a long time. Text I is also set out using quotes, this
contrasts with the modern text J which uses up to date time sections. The
advance in technology has allowed these live updates to be completed so people
can get live commentary on the game. People using text I would receive it two
to three days after the actual game. The modern day text J acts as an ephemera to
be read at a certain time and then discard. The idea that text I is a souvenir
text also suggests that a smaller number of people will read or have one. Text
J is widely available. It is free to read on the BBC sport website whereas text
I will cost a considerable amount of money. This is only possible because of
the advance in technology allowing sports news to be distributed cheaply. Good - however, I think because you are of a generation that takes technology for granted, ensure you do not miss the obvious - eg... most recent postings are at the top.
Thank you, Andrew, for your essay. Read my comments for development. Strive for absolute clarity. Don't be tempted to try and make AO2 fit.
ReplyDeleteRead my essay for further development. I hope it helps.